Showing posts with label first-time offenders. Show all posts
Showing posts with label first-time offenders. Show all posts
Friday, April 10, 2015
Teen Courts: A Call for Accountability
Teen courts, also known as youth courts or peer courts, are not new phenomena. Since the 1970s, over 800 teen courts have popped up around the nation; the majority were created in response to the United States Justice Department's Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention’s (OJJDP) push for alternative juvenile programs in the 1990s. While the court itself varies between four models, discussed below, jurisdictions across the country use teen courts to address the same types of offenders and crimes: first-time offenders, aged 11-17, who have been accused of misdemeanors such as theft, vandalism, underage drinking, disorderly conduct, assault, possession of marijuana, tobacco violations, and curfew violations. Because the teen court is offered as an alternative to going through the juvenile justice system, the accused typically have to admit guilt prior to admittance to the program.
Friday, October 31, 2014
New Marijuana Policy In Brooklyn, New York
District
Attorney Kenneth Thompson announced back in July a new policy
in regards to marijuana possession. Under the new policy, the Kings County
District Attorneys Office in Brooklyn, New York will no longer prosecute
first-time offenders who were arrested for low-level misdemeanor marijuana
possession. Low-level possession is twenty-five
grams or less. DA Thompson’s policy reasons for this change
included making better use of limited resources, and preventing otherwise good
young men from being saddled with a criminal record due to a minor, non-violent
offense. Before the policy was in effect, seventy
percent of those arrested for marijuana possession in New York had no prior
criminal record. Furthermore, eight-five percent of those who were arrested,
were minorities, specifically blacks and
Hispanics. In 2012
alone, more than 12,000 people were arrested for small amounts of marijuana
possession. The District Attorney also
cited that most judges in the county already tended to dismiss Class B misdemeanor
marijuana possession, and that the focus should be on more serious crimes.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

